Skip to main content

x86_64 vs ARMv8

Photo by Brian Kostiuk on Unsplash
Things are getting interesting in the SPO 600 course. It’s time to get familiar with modern processor architectures: the x86_64, which powers all most everything today and the new ARMv8 that is gaining traction mostly because of its energy efficiency. Also, for the first time, we will “forget” assembly and focus on the compiler.

So, what is the difference between x86_64 and ARMv8?

Making a processor is hard and expensive, so instead, they decided to make the x86 (32bits) to work as 64bits – x86_64. That strategy popularized the 64bit environment. On the other side, the ARMv8 was designed for 64bits from the beginning, and its energy efficiency made it accessible on mobile applications. Who remembers the RISC vs CISC competition? The RISC concept tells us to execute simple operations quickly. The CISC concept is quite the opposite: complex operations will perform better than a bunch of simple ones. Who won? Well, everybody won! Nowadays, the RISC introduced some CISC features and vice-versa and we have faster CPUs. Lastly, they all differ on registers, instructions, cache and many more.

Luckily, for the ones that don’t want to go assembly - like me - the compiler will know how to produce the executable for each architecture. However, we might end up with a not so well performed product as we were making it in assembly. To help us with that, there are compiler options (-static | -g | -fno-builtin | -O0 | -O3) that we can play around that could improve the overall performance.

We know that compilation is a painful process and can take a lot of time. To address this, the “make” utility will configure and compile our package. It is smart enough to know the proper execution sequence and what doesn’t need to be recompiled – due to no changes, for example.

My next post will talk more about the compiler. See you.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Going Faster

Photo by  Anders Jildén  on  Unsplash Today’s topic is compiler optimizations. Besides translating our source code into machine binary executable, the compiler, based on optimization parameters, can also produce faster executables. Just by adding some parameters to the compiler, we can get a better performance or a smaller executable, for example. There are hundreds of those parameters which we can turn on or off using the prefix -f and -fno. However, instead of doing one by one, we can use the features mode using the -O param. It ranges from 0 (no optimization – the default) to 3 (the highest). Using those parameters has a cost —usually, the faster, the larger executable. How does the compiler make it faster if my code is perfect? I’m going to put some methods here, but if you want, here is more detail . Also, bear in mind that most of the optimizations are done in the intermediate representation of the program. So, the examples below are rewritten just to...
Post a Comment
Read more

Colour Selection

Photo by Scott Webb  on  Unsplash Today I'll talk about Lab 4. We had to pick two tasks out of four and develop the solution using my least favour language: assembly. Our group chose the options 2 (data input form) and 4 (screen colour selector) thinking that would be the easiest ones. The other options were adding calculator and hexdump. This post will talk about the colour selector, and my next will be the input form. The colour selector project was quite easy to do relatively. There are only 16 colours available (0 to F in hex). We have to list them in the text area and allow the selection using the cursor (up and down). Once the colour is selected, we have to paint the graph area. The graph area we did before. Basically, we have to store the colour code for every pixel in the display using the memory location between $0200 and $05FF. In the last post, we deal with up and down keys to change the numeric display. However, we never dealt with character display bef...
Post a Comment
Read more

Project Stage 3

Photo by  NASA  on  Unsplash Hello! In this post, I’ll make a list of optimization opportunities that I identified on the AWK project based on what I’ve learned in the SPO600 classes. There are two types of optimizations: portable and platform-specific. Portable optimizations are the ones that work everywhere, like better algorithms and implementations, and also compiler building flags. Platform-specific, on the other hand, works only for a targeted architecture. Like the SIMD instructions available only on Arch64 and many others specific for x86_64. It is possible to “force” the usage of such instructions according to the targeted hardware. We can do that on compilation time, and also on run-time. Now that we know our options, let’s dig in. According to my previous post , the functions nematch and readrec are the hotspots. Here is the command line used to run the awk: ./awk 'BEGIN {FS = "<|:|=";} {if ($8 == "DDD>") a ++;} END {print "cou...
Post a Comment
Read more